Sigma 19 Stöbern in Kategorien
Sigma 19mm F2, 8 DN Art Objektiv (46mm Filtergewinde) für Sony-E Objektivbajonett schwarz auf gezelligegezinswoning.nl - Kameras und Zubehör zu günstigen Preisen. Sigma 19 mm F2, 8 EX DN-Objektiv (46 mm Filtergewinde) für Sony-E Objektivbajonett auf gezelligegezinswoning.nl - Kameras und Zubehör zu günstigen Preisen. Shop Sigma 19mm f/ DN MFT Fit Lens - Black, 40B Free delivery and returns on eligible orders. Sigma bietet mit der DN-Serie ein solides Objektivsortiment für spiegellose Wechselobjektivkameras. Das seit Mitte erhältliche 19mm f DN eignet sich je. Das SIGMA Art 19mm F2,8 DN ist ein Hochleistungs-Weitwinkel-Objektiv für spiegellose Wechselobjektiv-Kameras.
Taugt das Sigma 19mm FObjektiv für Sony E-Mount? In diesem Bericht lasse ich es gegen das Kit-Objektiv antreten. Erfahre, wie es bei mir. zu Sigma 19mm ,8 DN. Neu 11; Gebraucht 4. Sigma 19mm F2,8 DN Art Objektiv (46mm Filtergewinde) für Micro Four Thirds. Festbrennweite: 19 mm Ideal für. Sigma 19 mm F2, 8 EX DN-Objektiv (46 mm Filtergewinde) für Sony-E Objektivbajonett auf gezelligegezinswoning.nl - Kameras und Zubehör zu günstigen Preisen. Befriedigend 2,9 6 Tests. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24mm f1. Alle Auktion Sofort-Kaufen. Kostenloser Versand. Die Innenfokussierung behebt die häufigsten Abbildungsfehler, um die Bildqualität über den gesamten Fokussierbereich zu erhalten Mehrschichtvergütung Multicoating. Blendenzahl min. Sigma dp2 Quattro. Linear Play Casino Online Voice-Coil-Motor. Unter Anwendung dieses Systems überprüfen wir jedes Objektiv unserer neuen Produktlinie in unserem Werk.
Sigma 19 VideoSigma 19mm 2.8 Art Lens (Review By Jack Crofts)
Sigma 19 VideoSigma DN Lenses Review (19mm, 30mm, 60mm) - 4K
I have the 60mm. The 19mm even at 2. When online sellers are out of stock, they change the price so high, that no buys it.
Once they have stock, they put it back to the normal price. To what end? To maybe capture the one lunatic willing to pay that price on Earth?
All they do is look silly by doing that. Maybe, but that was the explanation I got from a online seller once. I don't know why they can't just cancel the auction and re-list it once it is in stock.
Pretending to have stock is a sham. Recently, Chrysler warned people about some of its own dealers who were pretending they could get Wildcat editions of the Challenger and Charger when the supply was severely restricted.
I have the set - good value and I can recommend. As I love to shoot predominately in MF mode, I need a lens that works well in full manual, and the issue with the ultra lightweight 19mm, is that the plastic lens barrel is susceptible to a roughness when even gently squeezed by the fingers to rotate the focus ring.
The focus ring is not easily moved without a little tab on it like the Voigtlanders or Leicas, or the serrated grip surface of the Sony or Zeiss lenses, so one has to grip the smooth focus ring from both sides by the finger and thumb to comfortably adjust focus - and that very light pressure actually deforms the lightweight plastic focus ring enough to make the focusing rough and difficult to find perfect focus, in my experience.
I'm not sure if this is a specific lens issue, but it would seem to me that the barrel integrity will not change from one lens to another, and that the lens is simply not designed for solid MF focusing.
I only have the 60mm, but there's no plastic on the focus ring or anywhere else. It's all metal. The 19mm looks similar to me. It doesn't appear that you have the current version.
I checked again, and you may be right, it could be steel or aluminum. I don't know. It's very light. Regardless, the focus usage issues are what spoils it for me.
In AF mode, it's fine, of course, and I recognize that most folks would simply use AF most of the time, so it's a personal usage issue for me.
I am curious, though Does it support full-time manual override in AF mode? No, not at all. Focus is as good as it gets with focus by wire.
Very smooth and quite responsive. I can't see how anyone could deform the focus ring with finger pressure. It is solid, no deflection at all.
There is no manual override, but does the a even support that feature? None of my lenses do it. I configured button C2 for MF.
Pixel peeped the A 60mm f2. That said I'm satisfied with the OSS, sharpness, f1. These lenses are excellent even if they aren't exceptional.
The conclusion is bizarre, even more so since they are so so cheap and yet not cheapo plastic fantastics. I chose to go with an Oly 17mm 2.
The price isn't much different, and at the time I bought the older Oly lens worked out cheaper. And it's not like most of the kit zooms are bad The around normal mm range is less crowded, so the 30mm stands out more.
The other options are all a lot more expensive for a pretty small amount of low light performance. And for reasons that escape me, it seems like people tend to buy primes for wide angle and normal use more than they do for tele.
Very flexible lens. So it might be people tend to discount how useful a longer prime can be. I have the 19 and 60mm Sigmas for my Sony a The 19 is good and the 60 is truly wonderful and very sharp, especially when price is considered.
I use a Nikon DE and D and all those heavy DSLR lenses for much of my work, but for personal travel and walk around I stick the a with it's collapsible kit lens in one pocket and the 2 Sigmas in the other and I'm off.
I have a couple of big trips coming up and while I really want to drag the big Nikons along, I probably will confine myself to this little set and my back and neck will be much happier.
I was a Nikon owner before and never regret one bit the change to mirorless. My next lens could be the Sigma 30mm!!! For street pictures. Clint, I've been using the Sigma 19 and 30mm extensively for street and interior photography with my NEX7.
I find that the 30mm is an exceptional lens, very good Image Quality, very compact. The 16mm is good for outside work under good light but not so good for interior work under poor lighting conditions.
I'm looking forward to using those two lenses on the a ;-. Sharpness measurements are only 9 and 10mp for the 30 and 19mm Sigmas on an a The 90mm equivalent view is ideal for portraits, and there's no need to stop down.
The Sigma 60mm is tack sharp across the frame, with negligible CA's from wide open. I have no problem calling this an Art lens. Sigma knocked it out of the park with this one.
I know it's lame, but I think the Art lenses look pretty attractive on the a I own the original 19mm and 30mm lenses and the new style 60mm. I've have to fight the stupid desire to buy the newer style 19mm and 30mm lenses whenever I get a good look at the 60mm on the camera.
The modern look of the Sony camera plays so well with the modern clean look of the Sigmas that I wouldn't be surprised to see the pair at MOMA someday.
I don't own the Metz 26 AF-1, nor have I seen it in person, but from the photos I've seen, I think the Sigmas, a, and the Metz 26 would make the best looking camera system out there today.
Yeah, I know it's lame, but with all the retro going on in the camera industry now, looks do mean something to some people. Maybe my copy of it is just better than the one used in this review I would have thought the 60mm is better than this slightly 'qualified' review suggests.
On the GX7 I would say it is outstanding by any measure. I don't get this review. The 60mm is the stuff of legends - for a lens that is UNDER bucks it's peak sharpness is off the charts - up there with a buck Olympus and a buck Voightlander lens.
Either the reviewer got a bad example or something else is wrong. When lenses are cheap, there are often numerous "bad examples" so the reviewer's opinion could be as valid as those who think the lens is great.
Not a single other test said 60mm had problems with quality. Something is wrong with this DP review. They should sell really well, since there is hardly anything remotely competitive from the mirrorless camera makers.
I realise they are no longer in a normal range and harder to make. What are you waiting for, Sigma? It is very very likely Sigma will release a 14mm as these are all essentially detachable versions of the lenses made for their DP series cameras, of which they have recently announced a DP0Q with 14mm f4, so there is a good chance we will see that for their DN series soon.
Lenses for DP cameras differ from detachable lenses. They are more complicated and have more advanced optical formulae. Let's be honest and truthful here.
The Sigma 60mm is the sharpest lens for M43 based on all reliable tests, along with the Olympus 75mm, the Panasonic Leica I suspect this review may be based on a poor sample.
Besides the tests like Lenstip, there are also numerous user comments saying the same, i. Based on my own experience in use, this Sigma is indisguidhable from my 75mm, and in fact it appears just slightly better in some cases.
The superiority at its widest aperture over all the other lenses are also confirmed by Lenstip. Given that, I'd expect it to be sharp. Yes, I keep hearing this from people, that they'd buy slow lenses if given the choice.
I just don't believe it. Beyond the increased noise because of having to use a high ISO with a slow aperture, there are focusing issues that come into play as well.
Also, manual focusing is easier with a faster lens. Do you know the difference between a prime lens and a zoom? There are only a handful.
Fast primes give you an edge when it comes to focusing in low-light, no matter what camera you use. And kudos for having a picture of a cute kid as a sample image.
I think a lot of us so-called photographers got into photography in the first place to get good pictures of our little ones. That's a "normal", not a "wideangle".
The definition of "normal" is a focal length approximately equal to the image circle. A 30mm is a "normal" on the 28mm diagonal sensor of the Sony E system.
I got the 19mm for my A and it's totally meh. After using it as a walkaround lens for a week it now mostly collects dust on my lens shelf.
It's not much faster than the kit lens at 19mm 2. The IQ of the kit lens improves quite a bit once you leave the extreme wide end so your not getting tons more resolution if any.
AF is only on the center. I thought this wouldn't be an issue as on my canons I use center point AF but once you get used to the A's wonderful tracking AF a lens without it feels really lacking.
The reviewer is gaga about the cost but is it really that great? Canon has the terrific 24mm F2.
I tried the Sig 19 and sent it back after doing a comparison with my kit lens. I shot the kit lens at 21mm to easily distinguish it. Jun2 I think you misunderstood.
I'm not talking about "other bargains" as I don't think the 19mm is a bargain at all, it's overpriced for so so not great IQ and very little to distinguish it from the kit lens.
The canon examples were not "other bargains" they are examples of some real bargains. The 24mm F2. Interesting review. The reviewer keeps talking about decent sharpness, while posting gallery shots that are sharp as hell.
I own the original 30, and use it on a Nex 5n, Sharpest lens I own, and a perfect "normal" for me. Misses focus from time to time I thought missing focus due to the lens was supposed to be a thing of the past on mirrorless, since the AF is performed directly on the image sensor.
Seems like it would be the camera missing AF, more than the lens? It's not a huge thing, or dealbreaker --I use it a lot, and love the sharpness.
That would allow for some conclusions about those I read sth about 60mm being slightly awkward to use same remarks I found on 90mm … 'slightly too long' , but I think it is just a matter of being used to sth.
Sitting at a table the distance to people sitting across is good for portraits with a little bit of acrobatics … , while with 70mm or longer you'd need to take a step away.
Also, I find the crop shown above Brooklyn girl a good balance between respectful distance and intimacy. I considered two other praised optics, Olympus 45mm equiv.
Field of view at 19mm. There are no hard stops at both ends of the range, making it a little more difficult to set focus at infinity. Polariser users should be pleased that the 46mm filter thread doesn't rotate on focus.
We didn't experience much "hunting", either in good or bad light, with the lens accurately focusing almost all of the time. It's also a quiet performer, thanks to the newly developed linear AF motor which makes this lens well-suited to video recording.
Chromatic aberrations, typically seen as purple or blue fringes along contrasty edges, can be detected in some shots but they are not very prominent at all.
With the lens set to its maximum aperture, there is a bit of light fall-off in the extreme corners, but it won't really affect your real-world shots.
There are no stops, hard or otherwise, at the close-focusing and infinity end of the lens. The included lens hood is plastic, attaches via a bayonet mount, and can be reversed onto the lens for storage.
Other test results are also better: CA is better handled, there is slightly less corner shading, and distortion is a bit less severe naturally barrel-distorted rather than pincushion.
There is somewhat significant corner shading, but almost zero distortion. In this case, the Olympus makes for a slightly smaller.
Conclusion There are a surprising number of alternatives in this category - wide primes for mirrorless cameras - so Sigma's offering comes at an interesting time.
It's not a case of Sigma finding a niche other manufacturers haven't exploited, however, Sigma does undercut all the current manufacturers with a lower price point.
The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color.
We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens.
For the ''VFA'' target the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource , we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images.
To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows.
I bought this as a 28mm equivalent lens for my A Performance is pretty much in line with the review though in my own tests it does not reach the admittedly dizzy heights of its 60mm brother, with the edges staying a notch below the centre.
Manual focus feel is not the best; rubber would be preferable to the shiny metal surface and would also give the lens a bit of heft.
But seriously, at this price there is nothing to really criticize: it even manages some decent bokeh!. Please Sigma: more E and FE mount lenses please?
The Sigma 19mm is not so much better as my mm on the OM-D, but its smaller and better for low light situations.HI RES LarryLatchkey Btw. Disponibile separatamente. MetaLog makes it easy to keep track of settings, locations and more for every film photo you capture. When online sellers are Beste Spielothek in Motlas finden of stock, they change the price so high, that no buys it. The focus ring is quite wide and ridged. Consiglio la messa a fuoco al centro e la ricomposizione. We have had no Beste Spielothek in Wiesbach finden, drops, bangs, extreme climate conditions Seems like it would be the camera missing AF, more than the lens? Iscriviti a JuzaPhoto! Men at Gta 5 Online Autos Finden. Per essere un'ottica fissa e neanche molto grandangolare, mi aspettavo meno distorsione. When lenses are cheap, there are often numerous "bad examples" so the reviewer's opinion Online Spiele Handy be as valid as those who think the lens is great. I use a Nikon SteuererhГ¶hung and D and all those heavy DSLR lenses for much of my work, but for personal travel and walk around I stick the a with it's collapsible kit lens in one pocket and the 2 Sigmas in the other and I'm off.